For decades there was just one trustworthy option to keep info on a pc – using a disk drive (HDD). Having said that, this type of technology is by now displaying it’s age – hard disks are loud and slow; they can be power–ravenous and have a tendency to produce a lot of heat in the course of intense operations.

SSD drives, alternatively, are fast, consume significantly less energy and are also far less hot. They provide a new method of file accessibility and data storage and are years in front of HDDs relating to file read/write speed, I/O effectiveness as well as power effectivity. Figure out how HDDs fare up against the more recent SSD drives.

1. Access Time

With the introduction of SSD drives, file access speeds have gone through the roof. As a result of unique electronic interfaces employed in SSD drives, the common file access time has been reduced towards a all–time low of 0.1millisecond.

HDD drives make use of rotating disks for data storage purposes. When a file will be accessed, you have to wait for the right disk to reach the correct place for the laser to reach the data file involved. This translates into a typical access rate of 5 to 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

On account of the completely new radical data storage strategy shared by SSDs, they feature better file access speeds and speedier random I/O performance.

For the duration of Echo86Host’s trials, all of the SSDs confirmed their ability to deal with a minimum of 6000 IO’s per second.

Having an HDD drive, the I/O performance gradually increases the more you apply the disk drive. Nevertheless, just after it reaches a particular cap, it can’t proceed quicker. And due to the now–old concept, that I/O limit is significantly less than what you could get having an SSD.

HDD can only go as far as 400 IO’s per second.

3. Reliability

The lack of moving parts and spinning disks in SSD drives, as well as the recent improvements in electrical interface technology have generated a considerably less risky data file storage device, with an average failure rate of 0.5%.

HDD drives employ rotating hard disks for holding and reading through data – a concept since the 1950s. And with hard disks magnetically hanging in the air, spinning at 7200 rpm, the probability of something failing are much increased.

The standard rate of failure of HDD drives can vary among 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

SSDs don’t have moving parts and need minimal cooling power. They also involve a small amount of energy to perform – lab tests have indicated that they’ll be powered by a common AA battery.

In general, SSDs use up between 2 and 5 watts.

As soon as they were developed, HDDs were always really power–heavy devices. And when you have a web server with numerous HDD drives, this will certainly raise the month–to–month utility bill.

Typically, HDDs take in between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

The faster the data file access speed is, the faster the file calls can be treated. Consequently the CPU do not need to arrange resources waiting around for the SSD to reply back.

The average I/O wait for SSD drives is just 1%.

HDD drives allow for sluggish accessibility speeds in comparison with SSDs do, resulting for the CPU being required to delay, while arranging resources for the HDD to discover and give back the demanded data.

The regular I/O delay for HDD drives is around 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Almost all of our completely new servers now use solely SSD drives. Our own lab tests have shown that with an SSD, the common service time for an I/O request while operating a backup stays below 20 ms.

All through the identical lab tests with the exact same hosting server, now suited out using HDDs, performance was substantially slow. During the web server backup process, the typical service time for any I/O demands varied somewhere between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

You can notice the real–world potential benefits to utilizing SSD drives daily. For example, with a web server furnished with SSD drives, a full backup is going to take merely 6 hours.

In contrast, on a hosting server with HDD drives, a comparable data backup may take three to four times as long in order to complete. A full backup of any HDD–driven server normally takes 20 to 24 hours.

Should you wish to at once boost the efficiency of your web sites without having to transform just about any code, an SSD–equipped hosting service will be a very good choice. Check our web hosting service packages and then our VPS servers – these hosting solutions have extremely fast SSD drives and are available at competitive prices.


  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • Each one of our Virtual Private Servers is configured for you free of charge. 99.9% network uptime. Full admin server access.
  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Conveniently examine the resources and features offered by Echo86Host’s Virtual Private Servers. Find exactly which VPS Hosting package will provide you with just what you will need to handle your multi–media web presence effortlessly.
  • Compare our hosting plans
  • Contact Us

  •  
  • We are online for you 7 days a week to resolve any inquiries regarding our VPS Hosting platform. 1–hour response time warranty.